dc speed cameras: a good thing?

DC residents cringed in unison when police announced they would add more speeding cameras to their arsenal. it seems there are two standard oppositions to the camera program - the first that it is "unfairly" enforcing the law only to enrich police department coffers, and the second that it is a violation of privacy.

the most serious concern is one of privacy, but cameras actually ensure greater privacy. they do take an up-close picture of the license, but that's hardly a legitimate invasion of personal privacy as the license is government property. even if it is, it's far better than the alternative. cameras are used instead of flesh-and-blood police officers who would be nosier than an electronic optical lens. the officer would definitely see both the operator and the inside of his/her car if s/he where pulled over, which is a much bigger concern.

cameras are better for police department budgets, which may be better for taxpayers too. not requiring pensions, retirement, or health benefits, they're much cheaper. they're also less of a liability. a more efficient department is good for the citizenry because, theoretically, it will stymie tax hikes.

a faster and more convenient way to be fined, cameras also are more efficient even for the lawbreaker. those who have been pulled over recall that it's not a pleasant experience. although receiving a ticket in the mail is not fantastic, one can deal with at his/her convenience at least, and not have to deal with obnoxious officers.

by reducing the chance that punishment is subject to an officer's whims and prejudices, cameras help maintain a more objective rule of law. consistency in law enforcement should not be lamented, and any step to increase consistency and decrease subjective, erratic enforcement is good.

cameras are simply a way to cheaply enforce a law citizens and lawmakers feel is best for the safety of pedestrians and drivers alike. those who have problems with cameras should investigate their objection further and may find they really oppose speed limits - at least unreasonable ones.

you can always try civil disobedience if you don't like it.

update: tim points out that universal enforcement has another benefit: forcing people to reevaluate their (implicit or otherwise) support for silly laws. check it out!