Friday, August 10, 2007
from the archives: age and decision making
"This pattern suggests that younger and older adults' comparison processes are influenced by different goals," she said. "Even when older adults show little or no signs of cognitive decline, they make decisions differently than younger adults, in ways that should help them avoid regret."
Labels: decision making, well being
the trackback URL for "from the archives: age and decision making" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/110844527019579151
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, February 05, 2007
o'rourke on wealth of nations
Smith's logical demonstration of how productivity is increased through self-interest, division of labor, and trade disproved the thesis (still dearly held by leftists and everyone's little brother) that bettering the condition of one person necessarily worsens the condition of another. Wealth is not a pizza. If I have too many slices, you don't have to eat the Domino's box.By proving that there was no fixed amount of wealth in a nation, Smith also proved that a nation cannot be said to have a certain horde of treasure. Wealth must be measured by the volume of trades in goods and services - what goes on in the castle's kitchens and stables, not what's locked in strongboxes in the castle's tower.
Labels: economics, well being
O'Rourke regularly contributes to the weekly news game show, Wait Wait Don't Tell Me, on NPR.
By 
galt2112, at
Wed Apr 02, 11:21:00 PM
the trackback URL for "o'rourke on wealth of nations" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/3947130192189195340
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
do straight teeth increase happiness?
although this is an interesting idea, i'm not sure it holds water because those who do and don't get braces differ in many ways. there are likely certain kinds of parents who push getting braces and certain kinds of kids who whine until they are allowed them. there are also, potentially, certain kinds of parents and kids who just don't think it's worth it. such individuals may not be worse off later in life, whereas the group who cares would be unhappy later if denied braces. psychology has shown that your concern for others' perception of you colors all social interactions.
since circumstances between the two groups differ, this means it is difficult to measure psychological impact of bad teeth. a better study would control for such confounding variables as preference, income, and insurance. perhaps looking at individuals who wanted but couldn't get braces for some medical/income/insurance/parental reason would be a good place to start. can't we get an economist to do the study?
Labels: economics, well being
I agree that it would be very difficult to really assess the psychological impact of braces. Leaving aside the relatively few people who require braces for medical reasons, it does seem that individuals (or their parents) at least intend to improve the recepient's psychological well being by improving his/her appearance.
We do know that straight smiles are considered more attractive, both independent of and as part of facial symmetry. We also know that teeth are an observational measure of health, which is an observational measure of status. It seems to me that trying to discern the psychological impact of braces alone seems rather irrelevant, as it's just a part of making oneself appear more attractive to themselves and others in the same manner as clothing. The only relevant question I can see here is one of value, which hearkens back to your plea for an economist to tackle the question. We don't typically pay the cost of braces for a new shirt -- in fact, a more complicated orthodontic procedure falls closer in price to laser eye surgery, or maybe even a boob job.
So, is permanently altering your appearance "worth" the financial cost and the inconvenience? I would say not necessarily in the case of the laser eye surgery because of the availability of substitutes such as contacts. I would also say there are mitigating factors in the case of breast augmentation -- the first that comes to mind is that breast size is not as universally regarded as important for appearance as a smile. But as for braces, I'm pretty firmly in the yes camp. Parents should be subjecting their children to braces as early as medically possible to give them the longest possible time to "recover" socially. Admittedly, it's going to be very difficult to prove the impact of braces at age 10 on social status or ability to find a mate, but I'm going to stand by my assertion for the time being.
By Chad, at
Sat Feb 03, 11:38:00 AM
so if braces make one more symmetrical/attractive, this result also may have a little something to do with social comparisons. results may differ in the US where straight teeth are more the norm.
your comment also made me think... braces are not often the decision of the child, nor does the child pay the cost. how much weight a person puts on their appearance isn't a determining factor in getting braces. so although people are not always accurate in predicting what will improve their future happiness, it may be better to look only at individuals who chose to get braces in adulthood.
By ns, at
Sun Feb 04, 01:07:00 AM
the trackback URL for "do straight teeth increase happiness?" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/921247854364688378
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Wednesday, August 09, 2006
from the onion
the trackback URL for "from the onion" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/115513651259672812
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
hedonic leveling is crap
first, a definition:
hedonic leveling: the increase in happiness produced when an item is acquired diminishes soon afterward. levels returns to default-state.my trip to europe reminded me of one great example of how crap this theory is: my ipod. i cannot express the enjoyment i get from my ipod, even three years after its purchase. granted, it may not be as much as during its first week of use, but it hasn't decreased significantly in the past three years.
lay term: taking for granted
yet it is undeniable that we become accustomed to some things. so perhaps the question really is: what characteristics distinguish items resistant to hedonic leveling? mutability and sporadic use may be two factors. i can continually add new songs, books, playlists. new features are created continually; now i can even add a feature to monitor my steps and calorie consumption. items used infrequently may also avoid leveling as one does not readily adjust to them.
and of course, i cannot end a post on hedonic leveling without saying that although certain items may experience this phenomenon, they are still creating a marked increase in our well-being. an excellent example is marriage, which has received much press re: leveling. healthcare and mass transit are other good examples. one must remember that happiness is perhaps one of the least important factors for well-being.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "hedonic leveling is crap" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/115481606040626605
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Saturday, August 05, 2006
mapping happiness
it may be interesting to compare this to the economic freedom map:
(blue=most free)
but i'm confused. does anyone know how this world happiness stuff matters at all if one's default-state affect is largely genetic? psychologists need to make up their minds.
check out some other maps, too.
Labels: neuroscience, well being
the trackback URL for "mapping happiness" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/115481431183056433
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, July 17, 2006
not surprising: men act tough around women
When the men were tested by a male researcher dressed in jeans and a T-shirt they were able to withstand nearly a third more pain than their female counterparts.this study does not indicate whether subjective valuation of pain changed via some neural or hormonal mechanism, or whether the male subjects were simply lying to act "tough." i also wonder how this relates to the researcher's earlier work on low symptom report rates among males.
But when the volunteers were tested by a 21-year-old female dressed in a skirt and high heels "to emphasis her gender role", the men reported pain thresholds much higher than in the tests with the male researcher.
no result, in either direction, was shown in female subjects.
Labels: misc. psych, well being
the trackback URL for "not surprising: men act tough around women" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/115186857421515435
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Friday, June 09, 2006
happiness on the left
the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been implicated in emotion modulation. activation patterns in the right PFC seem most activated under situations of threat, anxiety, and stress.
so what does this mean - can we just figure out how to quiet the right brain to find happiness? no, causation goes the other way. this just tells us which areas of the brain are being used to handle unpleasant states such as stress and anxiety. what it may do, however, is help avoid some of the survey biases that occur when simply asking someone what they feel. one crux of survey analyses is that few tell the truth, and it would be much simpler just to see it on a brain scan.
but some, unlike our lady peace, think that eating fish may be a link to happiness. a recent study correlate fish consumption to happiness, citing omega-3 fatty acids as the likely culprit. others say that boredom (and its oft-associated depressed affect) is a cleverly devised evolutionary tool, so perhaps happiness isn't the goal anyway. but as this north carolina government site says, it's all about the attitude - whatever that means (yes, tax dollars created that!). and we all know that uncle sam knows best.
Labels: neuroscience, well being
the trackback URL for "happiness on the left" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/114633143687279450
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
quote on intertemporal choice
It may be said that pure abstinence, being a mere negation, cannot produce positive effects; the same remark might as well be applied to intrepidity, or even to liberty; but who ever objected to their being considered as equivalent to active agents? To abstain from the enjoyment which is in our power, or to seek distant rather than immediate results, are among the most painful exertions of the human will. It is true that such exertions are made, and indeed are frequent in every state of society, except perhaps in the very lowest, and have been made in the very lowest, for society could not otherwise have improved; but of all the means by which man can be raised in the scale of being, abstinence, as it is perhaps the most effective, is the slowest in its increase, and the least generally diffused -- Nassau W. Senior
from decision science news archives.
Labels: decision making, well being
the trackback URL for "quote on intertemporal choice" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/114671161581765524
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Sunday, June 04, 2006
brain scans and ice cream
so does this mean some of us are doomed to give in to cravings? not necessarily. answer: brain plasticity! although our original make-up or behaviors that have been hard-wired through years of social influence are strong, we can significantly effect the functioning of our brains. case in point is the arrowsmith school, which my friend debi pointed out to me a few weeks ago. a PhD student who herself was learning-disabled constructed brain "exercises" to work the deficient areas. according to reports, this has been a dramatic success. her technique is being adopted in other canadian schools as well. what i would love, love, love to see is a fMRI study comparing students before and after the school's lessons.
so, in summary, you're not stuck with what you've got. you've just got to really want what to change and figure out how to do it. perhaps someday we'll have brain exercises for self-control.
Labels: neuroscience, well being
the trackback URL for "brain scans and ice cream" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/114928692595730473
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Sunday, April 23, 2006
hotel owner slims down guests
although some businesses may benefit from relatively unhealthy habits (e.g. little debbie, mcdonalds), i wonder if they could see long term benefit from unhealthy customers. i would think that a far-sighted company would make their foods as healthy as possible while maintaining sales, right? a healthy person may eat a lot more little debbie cakes in her life than a morbidly obese person who will die 10 years earlier, even if she eats less per day. the healthy consumer will be a better and longer-lasting messenger for the product as well.
as nick naylor says in thank you for smoking, "it's in our best interest to keep robin alive and smoking."
update: although it may be in businesses' best interest to keep their customers alive, healthy, and using their products, it is just the opposite for governments with socialized medical care.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "hotel owner slims down guests" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/114295804923988800
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Thursday, March 16, 2006
happiness: public good?
studies indicate that good mood can also be contagious. one recent experiment mentioned in the APS article grouped participants with either a positive or negative confederate, and participants indeed shifted toward the confederate over time. this indicates that folks with depressed affect could benefit greatly from a chipper companion.
are policies promoting happiness are justified by this study - is happiness is a public good? maybe, and lucky for us that those policies feature a great deal of political and individual liberty (see: happiness & economics). but i'm not sure. there are many situations in which lower moods actually are better, such as in accurately assessing situations and developing strategies (which can later positively impact well-being), and indicating how seriously to treat incoming information. so in this light, perhaps spreading preternatural happiness is not such a good idea.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "happiness: public good?" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/114239658770634845
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, January 23, 2006
price of pleasure
endorphin-boosters aside, reserach suggests we should be more strategic about the kinds of things we purchase to make us happy:
In a nationwide phone survey of 1,279 adults, respondents were much more likely to claim that a prior experiential purchase made them happier than a material one—57 percent versus 34 percent—even after accounting for differences in price.this makes sense, although the study seems methodologically flawed, relying solely on recall of items purchased. it is also difficult to account for life quality improvements, a standard complaint of happiness studies - for example, you may not report that a washer & dryer increases your happiness in the same way that a trip to aruba does, but it reduces hassle and frees up time and money for more enjoyable (experiential) activities, etc.
in addition, as the article notes the distinction between experiential and material goods is a bit blurry. most seem to contain both components, guerlain's happylogy products being a great example.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "price of pleasure" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/111976941746090189
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Friday, January 20, 2006
missing the point again
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it: it would be hell on earth.
-- george bernard shaw
psychology today reports that hell-on-earth to others - marriage - may not increase one's every day happiness. we tend to return to our happiness "set point" after time, a process called "hedonic leveling."
this is interesting, but it really misses the point entirely (as with much pop happiness research). as happiness is only one small part of the purported benefits of marriage. finding that marriage doesn't help one cope with severe illness, family crises, child rearing, or other major events - now that would be a relevant study.
update: marriage may increase wealth (and therefore, in my opinion, possibly well-being):
Married people will see an increase in wealth that is more than just adding the assets of two single people, according to the study that was published in the Journal of Sociology.
for more on happiness, see will's excellent blog.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "missing the point again" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/113777059699779243
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
while i was out...
hot and exciting studies in the psychology realm:
- there's a neurological differences between liking and craving sweets. this may hold interesting application to those with drug or eating abnormalities (i.e., liking cocaine may be governed by different neurons than craving it). however, recent evidence also suggests that overeating is often encouraged by social cues rather than cravings. does that mean the rise in compulsive eating support groups is bad? maybe not - it's better to be overweight anyway.
- neural substrates behind the brave lover dueling for his lady's honor: it's all about oxytocin. oxytocin is a hormone thought to be involved with trust, love, breastfeeding, and now with a reduced sense of fear. so, perhaps all we need is a little love to combat those pernicious ad campaigns. (see a previous post on oxytocin and risky decision making)
- the coeval nature of happiness and success exists (PDF). here's an article about the article if you don't have adobe or journal access. will also posted on it.
- self-help books will ruin your life (rather, rewarding poor performance in kids, and creating an unrealistically positive self-image and outlook for you, will):
You cannot have a life plan predicated on the belief that everything is equally achievable to you — especially if that same message has been sold indiscriminately to all comers. In the grand scheme of things, knowing one's limitations may be even more important than knowing one's talents. - could romantic love prevent stroke damage? in separate studies, an increase in nerve growth factor (NGF) has been linked to both the onset of romantic love and reduced damage for stroke victims. thanks to debi for the love/NGF link.
- neural correlates of monogamous relationships found, at least in prairie mice. patterns get "worn" into the brain, and after a while other females don't produce the same neural responses in male brains - i.e., in a monogamous relationship, other females become less something, perhaps we can term it "attractive."
other items:
- deforestation --> cannibalism
update: just fixing a ^$&% link.
Labels: links, neuroscience, well being
the trackback URL for "while i was out..." is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/113535833108666531
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, December 05, 2005
chaos = cooperation
no, seriously, it's fascinating. a clip:
The [traffic] circle is remarkable for what it doesn't contain: signs or signals telling drivers how fast to go, who has the right-of-way, or how to behave. There are no lane markers or curbs separating street and sidewalk, so it's unclear exactly where the car zone ends and the pedestrian zone begins. To an approaching driver, the intersection is utterly ambiguous - and that's the point.well, the point is that eliminating top-down driving rules makes drivers more cautious, use their own judgment, and allows them to create their own norms for driving etiquette. evidence given suggests that this indeed makes roads safe and less congested.
the article criticizes the "old ways" of civil engineering – the days of the 5-lane highway - and instead advocates for more smaller, slower roads which strike me as similar to the kind that may have emerged spontaneously. government is said to make travel more organized and therefore safer, but perhaps those two concepts are not always linked.
it's worth noting that homes are still being taken every day for these road projects based on an old model of driver psychology, which may actually worsen the problem they're meant to cure.
one lingering question i have is how they enforce safe driving without rules - do they forgo preemptive enforcement, or is it subjective based on the officer's judgment of safe driving?
hat tip to reihan. title shamelessly stolen from subtitle in the article. i’m not that clever.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "chaos = cooperation" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/113381573622827782
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Sunday, November 06, 2005
quotable quote: happiness vs. well-being
you want a functioning gas gauge - you don't want a gas gauge stuck on full.the terms happiness and well-being are often conflated in popular understanding of the well-being literature, and even sometimes in the academic literature. as this quote indicates, there are important differences between the two concepts, both academically and in policy implications.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "quotable quote: happiness vs. well-being" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/113129242428357286
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Sunday, October 30, 2005
to choose, or to not have a choice?
the craze for television makeover shows on gardening, plastic surgery and clothing is partly responsible for a dangerous addiction to reinvention that can ruin livesreality shows convince viewers that they should improve themselves, creating "disposable identities" and impossible expectations. worse still, globalization creates the fast-paced and fluid economy that demands immediate, impossible, change. elliott and lemert warn this pressure leads to "emotional crisis, depression, confusion, breakdown, loss of personal identity and even suicide."
this dark forecast is contradicted by a study published in 2002 by the american psychologist. the study, by jeffrey arnett, suggests that "new individualism's" underlying force may be positive:
identity becomes less based less on prescribed social roles and more on individual choices, on decisions that each person makes about what values to embrace and what paths to pursue in love and work.arnett poses three reactions to this choice: identity confusion, seeking refuge in a structured subculture, or open embrace of the decision. most embrace their ability to pick-and-choose, and arnett sees this as not deleterious, but as increasing the likelihood that "they will find a psychologically rewarding match between these choices and their individual desires and abilities."
this all goes back to the tired choice crap: to choose, or to not have a choice? that is the question. psychologists can debate, but i know i'd rather suffer through the agony of selecting a perfectly fitting jeans, or a much cuter nose, than be without. the real question is, would i be just as happy with ill-fitting jeans if i didn't know the perfect ones existed? no, by definition; i'd be uncomfortable.
Labels: decision making, well being
the trackback URL for "to choose, or to not have a choice?" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/113073185333249356
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
war against being sick
At the time the order was signed, a spokeswoman for the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said the Public Health Service would probably recommend home quarantines when possible, but said they would be voluntary. It's unclear whether the federal takeover of state and local quarantine powers that Bush discussed Tuesday would be limited just to travel or involve broader home quarantines as well.interesting. doesn't cuba do that, too, to fight their AIDS epidemic?
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "war against being sick" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/112845030709830173
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, September 26, 2005
overconfidence paradox
...there appear to be multiple and sometimes unexpected ways to be resilient, and sometimes resilience is achieved by means that are not fully adaptive under normal circumstances.one such method is trait self-enhancement, the propensity to exhibit self-serving bias in both perception and attribution of desert and guilt. that is, it's a flawed, overly rosy picture of oneself. this research indicates that one who exhibits trait self-enhancement tends to be more resilient, healthy, and happy after traumatic events.
interestingly, in a previous post i noted that perhaps flawed self-assessment leads to an unrealistic assessment of one's ability to ride out a storm (or succeed at other risky endeavors) as well. combined with this research, it seems then that folks with a tendency for trait self-enhancement, although better at weathering disaster, may put themselves in more risky environs in the first place, creating a type of "overconfidence paradox. "
source: bonanno, george. resilience in the face of potential trauma. psychological science, june 2005
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "overconfidence paradox" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/112744386759225940
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Saturday, September 24, 2005
take heart, optimists. we're alright after all.
we image that people confronted with disasters must have a disturbed pattern of functioning. it makes sense; people should have a difficult time moving on after extraordinarily traumatic events. however, george bonanno at columbia university claims:
...the most common reaction among adults exposed to such events is a relatively stable pattern of healthy functioning coupled with the enduring capacity for positive emotion and generative experiences.given our pop psychological understanding of reaction to tragedy, this surprised me. why does it seem as if people should be less resilient than they are? two posibilities come to mind. first, traumatized victims are a better media story, increasing our perception of their actual incidence in a normal population. a cynic would also say it's in the mental health field's best interest to portray their services as necessary for everyone, but i'm not sure that's always the case, as most of them do seem honestly convinced of being essential.
this study is much needed as it highlights human's amazing coping mechanisms and the power of social networks. it shows our ability to eek out a happy - or at least satisfied - life following very unfortunate events. and that's not so bad.
for more on the good stuff in psychology, see positive psychology.
source: bonanno, george. resilience in the face of potential trauma. psychological science, june 2005
update: fixing typos, that's all.
Labels: social, well being
the trackback URL for "take heart, optimists. we're alright after all." is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/112744326483829380
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, September 05, 2005
optimistic octogenarians
the study, in part, tested working memory, the “scratch pad” of the brain. although it remained true that seniors preformed worse on many memory tasks, there was no significant deficit when processing positive emotional tasks.
perhaps the most interesting element of the study is that the results were inverted for younger participants, who were shown to have better working memories with negative emotional stimuli. younger adults have, in the past, been found to process negative information more thoroughly and weigh it more in decision-making. this makes sense evolutionarily, because neglecting negative information has greater risk to survival. of course, it’s difficult to separate between age and cohort effects in studies like these. it could just be that older generations were more optimistic than younger ones, so longitudinal studies would be necessary.
researchers propose socioemotional selectivity theory as the explanation for this phenomenon. in this theory, goals are ensconced in temporal contexts wherein youth focus on preparing for the future. individuals with restrictions on their time, such as older people and patients with terminal illness, focus on emotionally meaningful objects and events.
carstensen, l.l., and mikels, j.a. at the intersection of emotion and cognition. current directions in psychological science vol. 14 no. 3
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "optimistic octogenarians" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/112597601106891880
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Thursday, July 21, 2005
IQ and dementia
if the correlation between IQ and life satisfaction is still statistically insignificant after factoring in attrition, it would illustrate an important point. although one may be no happier or satisfied with a higher IQ, this trait may lend other important benefits impacting well-being aside from satisfaction with life. IQ may be just like wealth, in that sense, providing a type of insurance against later dissatisfaction or unhappiness, although not impacting it directly.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "IQ and dementia" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/112195107312605315
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, July 18, 2005
smartness and satisfaction
notwithstanding flaws with self-report data, this indicates that as a senior, IQ may do little to enhance satisfaction. this makes sense as, i imagine, IQ isn't related to health or companionship, more prominent factors in senior satisfaction.
importantly, it also shows that IQ is unrelated to one's satisfaction with her life decisions. the study posits that IQ must be unrelated, then, to good and bad decisions in life. although this rings true to some extent from my experience, as i know a lot of "smart" people who make very bad decisions, it may not be the full answer. perhaps people with lower IQs make more bad decisions, but are unable to recognize them or envision better alternatives for comparison.
a significant problem with this study - that i'm surprised the journal article didn't mention - is attrition, as people with lower IQs die earlier.
so does this mean that the tables are leveled? not necessarily. many psychologists believe that there are several types of intelligence, and that IQ measures only one. it's still unclear how other kinds relate to life satisfaction.
hat tip to world of psychology.
reference: alan j gow, martha c whiteman, alison pattie, lawrence whalley, john starr, and ian j deary. lifetime intellectual function and satisfaction with life in old age: longitudinal cohort study. british medical journal , jul 2005; 331: 141 - 142
Labels: decision making, well being
the trackback URL for "smartness and satisfaction" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/112164987553650003
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
making fierce mice nice
mice without a particular neural receptor display pathologically violent behavior, even killing their mates. this indicates that some kinds of violent behavior in normal mice are related to this receptor, whose presence and activity is genetically regulated.
scientists recently created mice with a human form of this receptor. although they lacked their species' receptor, just as the above mice did, they acted normally. this illustrates that the human receptor serves a homologous function, pinpointing one locus that relates to violent behavior in humans. moreover, it suggests that some pathological behaviors in humans may be linked to the gene for this receptor, a gene that has already been linked, i believe, to other abnormal behaviors such as those categorized under bi-polar disorder.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "making fierce mice nice" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/112102785317770965
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Sunday, June 26, 2005
violence paradox
being aggressive in the context of community violence could be an adaptive strategy that preserves adolescents' sense of control in a volatile and unpredictable environment. "This may seem counter intuitive, that violence in a violent context could be somewhat protective for psychological well-being among adolescent boys."the "vaccine" only works for males, it seems, and the older, the stronger the correlation. for girls, the inverse is true, with violent offenders becoming more depressed than their passive counterparts.
correlation is not always causation, and there are several explanations for this correlation besides that of a "violence vaccine." one among them is that there could be something particular about persons who act out violently that also prevents them from being depressed - perhaps a kind of proactive, although perverse, resilience.
acting violently could very well, however, actually help stave of depression. it could give the actor a feeling of control that is probably lacking in violent neighborhoods, a feeling that is very often discussed as a significant component of psychological well-being.
it seems fairly obvious why the correlation is positive for girls, who not only face the legal repercussions of violent actions, but also more social pressure to "behave" than boys typically do. in addition, the threshold for violent action in girls, i'm willing to bet, may be much higher. that is, girls are less prone to violence both biologically and socially. because of this, fewer girls act violently. since fewer girls act violently, the ones that do have reached a much higher threshold, skewing the sample towards really messed-up individuals who may be more likely to be depressed than the wider sample of boys who are violent at the drop of a hat.
Labels: misc. psych, well being
the trackback URL for "violence paradox" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/111976895308386960
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Thursday, April 28, 2005
ice cream: my anti-drug
The results showed that eating the ice cream had an immediate effect on parts of the brain that previous research has shown are activated when someone is really enjoying themselves.the “pleasure centers” this brief article mentions are in the dopaminergic centers involved in motivation and reward that are, interestingly enough, also activated by most controlled substances.
although we enjoy being high on ice cream (or IC, as it's known on the street), the health consequences of long-term abuse include obesity and high cholesterol, as well as greater risk of disorders such as type 2 diabetes. in addition, ice cream is expensive. a ben & jerry’s pint is around $4. consuming one or two of those puppies a day can really add up and siphon money away from more beneficial uses. when resources are tight and an IC craving strikes, things can get messy. case in point, me craving ice cream when i can't have it. witnesses can testify.
and in all seriousness, addiction is also a risk. overindulgence on any substance that overstimulates reward centers can induce the main feature of addiction, motivational toxicity*, when the effectiveness of rewards normally effective in governing behavior (namely, rewards promoting survival) are diminished. you could argue that ice cream counts as a normal reward, but that seems like stretching it to me.
interestingly enough the above seem to parallel justifications for the drug war.
physiologically, activation of reward centers is identical no matter the trigger substance. so, ice cream induces the same reaction in one’s brain in areas relevant to future behavior as that of controlled substances such as alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, or heroin. the only difference would be, i assume, the level of activity in the center which probably varies by drug type and potency. ice cream would, of course, be at the far bottom of the spectrum.
* motivational toxicity’s neurological substrates have not (yet) been identified. it’s commonly thought to be a decrease in dopaminergic function due to chronic use.
more about: different legal status, same physiology
Labels: neuroscience, well being
the trackback URL for "ice cream: my anti-drug" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/111469923850530272
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Monday, April 18, 2005
the point...
folks are all excited that studies cannot prove a positive correlation between wealth and happiness, with some large exceptions. psychologists seem to feel this discredits the merits of wealth (and, generally, capitalism). they may be wrong on several counts, and they also forget that happiness is correlated to very few things anyway. in fact, studies show that even one's health is not even correlated to her happiness.
to psychologists, studies of wealth and well-being "prove" that wealth is not an ultimate goal of society as it is not relevant, generally, to happiness. if one applies that logic to health vs. happiness discovery, we'd have to conclude that good health is also not a worthy goal in and of itself because it does not directly promote happiness. significant funds should be diverted from medical research to things psychologist deem more likely to produce happiness, like cognitive therapy, perhaps.
of course, no one dares to seriously make this argument, but it does help to illustrate how silly the well-being-over-wealth argument is. that the link between health and well-being is tenuous does not mean we should ignore health. health has objective value, and the same goes for wealth. and wealth may not make us that much happier, but it serves a net good nonetheless by, among other things, providing us with safety and security during crisis and disability.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "the point..." is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/110928476341326588
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Sunday, April 17, 2005
disability, wealth & well-being
The analysis showed that those whose financial assets had been above the median before they were disabled suffered a much smaller drop in self-reported well-being than those who had been below the median. A second analysis confirmed that there was a relationship between a person's net worth and the drop in their well-being after disability.of course those with more cash reserves are better equipped to handle disaster. although these reserves themselves, during good times, do not improve well-being, they certainly will cushion the fall during crisis. earlier i wrote on money's tangential effects on well-being during natural disaster:
the market has the best record of meeting the most essential levels of maslow's hierarchy of needs, even during times of crisis. for market pessimists, we can think of it as an insurance system. although we may pay in a certain percentage of happiness for materialism due to markets (a debatable premise), we gain when disaster strikes. and the gain may make it worth it.
wealth, then, becomes much more significant than psychologists claim. as wealth promotes well-being during crisis, and this well-being in turn facilitates not only healing, but accumulation of more wealth, the balance in your bank account is no laughing matter.
Labels: economics, well being
the trackback URL for "disability, wealth & well-being" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/111354180940894657
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Sunday, February 20, 2005
losing meaning and well-being through information
...even the most complicated of relationships and problems have an identifiable pattern. ...overloading the decision makers with information makes picking up that signature harder, not easer. To be a successful decision maker, we have to edit.this reminds me of a a study i read last month (pdf) in psychological science that hints at why we're so bad at decisions involving too much information. researchers at the university of queensland handed a group of academics information on the interaction between variables, and asked them to make a judgment requiring synthesis of the relationships.
synthesizing three variables was difficult, and more left the academics dumfounded:
“At the level of the four-way interactions, participants made comments such as “Everything fell apart and I had to go back”,” Professor Halford said.
a fashionable critique of the market is that it provides too much choice - i.e., too many variables to consider. consumers can become overwhelmed, and barry schwartz's book paradox of choice claims this leads to "bad decisions, to anxiety, stress, and dissatisfaction - even to clinical depression."
although by no means a scholarly work, gladwell's book is important in highlighting the counterintuitive observation that economizing is key in decision making, and it seems that process can alleviate some of the supposed psychological harms of the market. halford et. al have told us exactly how far we should go with the information we do use.
from all this we know we must economize, and by how much. now we need someone to tell us how to determine which variables to include in our analyses. i'm inclined to say that reviews are key here. for example, when purchasing a car i can test drive every car on the market and keep accurate record of my observations. my working memory will then overload and my mind will "drop" all of my mental bundles, leaving me tired, frustrated, and confused. a smarter option would be to pick up consumer reports and car & driver. they have done some of the filtering for me, and i can instead focus on a few key criteria.
the ironic part for market critics is that these filtering mechanisms are demanded by consumers, and provided via the free market, to help ameliorate the harms they critique.
[the tile of this post is derived from a quote by military genius paul van riper: "in the act of tearing something apart, you lose its meaning."]
reference: halford, gs, rosemary, b, mccredden, je, and bain, jd. "how many variables can humans process?" psychological science, january 2005
Labels: decision making, well being
the trackback URL for "losing meaning and well-being through information" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/110853014085667977
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
the lesser prairie chicken and private conservation
the lesser prairie chicken, an odd bird with an even stranger courtship routine, once roamed the western plains in flocks as large as 1,000 (a frightening prospect). hunting, overgrazing, and plowing destroyed their habitat, and in the last 100 years the lesser prairie chicken population has plummeted to just 3 percent of its former glory.the nature conservancy, a nonprofit based in arlington, virgnia, recently purchased nearly 20,000 acres of prime prairie chicken habitat in new mexico. although the ranch’s former owners will retain a limited livestock operation, the land will largely serve as a preserve for this and other imperiled prairie creatures. the acquisition is seen as a coup for prairie chicken preservation efforts, and benefits the ranchers as well. it will also presumably benefit taxpayers by halting many of creamer ranch’s usda subsidies.
the nature conservancy’s mission has always impressed me as being respectful of private citizens as well as the environment, two forces that need not always be at cross purpose. the conservancy strives to preserve habitat and species not by forcing others to conserve, but by simply purchasing and managing critical lands. since the land is then the conservancy’s alone, they can be confident that lands are treated in an ecologically sensitive manner. this method comes at no expense to taxpayers and to the mutual benefit of both the former land owner and the conservancy. many times the organization is able to purchase conservation easements at a lower cost, allowing owners to maintain usage of their lands while ensuring their preservation.
although i’m concerned with the conservancy’s recent direction, including an increasing reliance on governmental mechanisms for securing and maintaining lands, they’ve got the right idea in general for preserving critical habitat for endangered species.
Labels: social, well being
the trackback URL for "the lesser prairie chicken and private conservation" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/110861005266377073
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Saturday, January 08, 2005
well-being insurance
natural disasters, such as the recent tsunami, are horrific and cause profound damage both physically and psychologically. add to these observations and theories the correlation that wealthier and more market-oriented nations have are not impacted as severely by disasters, natural and otherwise. the inconceivable dearth of well-being resulting from disaster might outweigh the benefits of a non-materialistic, non-market, society unable to cope with disaster as well.
the problem with many well-being studies (especially the recent day-by-day studies) is that they do not account for major life events and their ongoing impact on every day well-being. events such as the tsunami will impact the people of those regions for decades to come, mostly for the worse. a child's college graduation may generate such a high volume of happiness that in net sum cancels out unhappiness due to the banal daily rearing tasks, tipping the scales in favor of children on the net making parents happy. so yes, perhaps some daily transactions in the market make us unhappy - but let's not forget the overall picture.
the market has the best record of meeting the most essential levels of maslow's hierarchy of needs, even during times of crisis. for market pessimists, we can think of it as an insurance system. although we may pay in a certain percentage of happiness for materialism due to markets (a debatable premise), we gain when disaster strikes. and the gain may make it worth it.
Labels: well being
the trackback URL for "well-being insurance" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/110507238180931537
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Tuesday, January 04, 2005
for happiness, practice makes perfect
the results of this study make a lot of sense. just like any other part of one’s body, if you train and use it regularly, it will perform in a different manner. until now, no one knew exactly what aspects of the brain monks were training.
chronically depressed individuals have lower activation in the lpc. in children, it’s silence has been implicated in attention deficit disorder – in fact, adderall stimulates the lpc, among other areas. its absence has even been implicated in turning a patient’s bipolar disorder into schizophrenia. this finding is a breakthrough - by practicing one may be able to increase its activity and possibly, therefore, reduce the above abnormalities naturally.
but perhaps i'm getting ahead of myself. a cautionary note comes from the researcher's own work. in a recent study (pdf), richard davison found no change in lpc activity when he trained students to meditate, which he attributes to the short duration and/or intensity of meditation. students did, however, show less anxiety and more blood antibodies.
thanks to john for the link!
Labels: neuroscience, well being
the trackback URL for "for happiness, practice makes perfect" is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/110489861632092801
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Thursday, December 30, 2004
i am happier, damn it.
MacCulloch (2000) reported that … in the United States only liberals are made less happy by inequality. Thus, the effects of societal characteristics depend to some extent on the ideological views of respondents.the belief that trade is positive sum, which libertarians tend to have, alleviates a great deal of guilt (as some of will's commenters noted), while participation in free trade creates unhappiness and dissonance among liberals. and then there's the whole belief that consumerism is the great evil consuming our souls.
(Deiner, E. and Seligman, M. “Beyond Money: Towards an Economy of Well-Being” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2004)
the liberal (and indeed, the conservative) point of view on human nature states that if left to our own devices, society would devolve into a dirty, violent, chaos devoid of good will or prosperity. we’d all lop off each other’s heads, force our youngins to sew wallets 17 hours a day, and worse still – we’d all smoke crack. and we certainly would not send our children to school (they're too busy with the wallets). what an awful thing to think about your species. it would make me cranky too.
i can go all day without encountering aggravating things - having to pay taxes or read about politics, for example. these are activities i go out of my way for. the things that make liberals unhappy are all around - rampant consumerism, inequality, trade, etc. etc...
let's forget about all these anti-povery policies. if we’re all truly concerned with well-being as the ultimate goal (which, granted, not everyone is), if we see gross national happiness as a greater meter than gross national product, we should all be libertarians. now, who’s gonna tell king wangchuck?
Labels: ideology, well being
the trackback URL for "i am happier, damn it." is: http://haloscan.com/tb/sullifred/110438620553360212
trackbacks for this post temporarily listed here
Wednesday, December 15, 2004
alcoholism allele
alcohol promotes release of endogenous opioids, which activate mu opioid receptors in the brain. this opioid system in turn affects the mesolimbic dopamine system involved in craving, reinforcement, and motivation. the mu opioid receptors are encoded by a specific gene, oprm 1, and they come in two varieties: the g and a version.
Results indicate that individuals with the G allele had higher subjective feelings of intoxication, stimulation, sedation, and happiness across trials as compared to participants with the A allele.which sounds great for those with the g allele. but there's a major drawback to this higher level of enjoyment - it creates more stimulation of those dopamine receptors involved in reinforcement and motivation, leading to higher probability of addiction. it seems to follow that this pattern may be the same for other drugs that stimulate the opioid system such as heroin, opium, and cocaine (cocaine indirectly, because as with alcohol it is not an opiate derivative).
this is an incredible finding with heath and policy implications. it is important to be aware of a genetic predisposition for any disorder, so one may modify his/her behavior. just one may watch his/her eating and exercise habits if predisposed to diabetes or heart disease, one with a g allele should be careful of alcohol consumption.
as g allele folks get "higher subjective feelings of intoxication, stimulation, sedation" and etc. with lower blood alcohol levels than the a types. should a and g allele folks be subject to the same blood alcohol levels in drunk-driving tests, then? (actually, a different test would be better still)
in addition, i wonder if those with a alleles are subject to comparatively heavier binge drinking and therefore health problems than one with a g allele (for those who do not develop chronic alcoholism). since a types must drink more to become intoxicated, and to many the goal of drinking is intoxication, it seems logical that they would drink more on a particular night. just imagine if you needed 1,000 more calories per day to feel full than someone else the same size. you'd definitely feel the physical effects of that.
reference: Hutchison, K. E. and Ray, L. A. "A polymorphism of the gamma-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) and sensitivity to the effects of alcohol in humans." Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 28, 12
Labels: neuroscience, well being
the trackb
Post a Comment